Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Lang v. Ellis
as 5:2026cv00149
Plaintiff:
Jason Lloyd Lang
Defendant:
Charles J. Ellis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ellis v. Dollar General Corporation et al
as 4:2026cv00103
Plaintiff:
Jakarra Ellis
Defendant:
Dollar General Corporation and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Hubbard v. STATE FARM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2026cv08262
Plaintiff:
Ellie Hubbard
Defendant:
STATE FARM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Ramirez et al v. APPLE, INC.,
as 5:2026cv07713
Plaintiff:
James Ramirez, Christopher Ellis and Jalen Delgado
Defendant:
APPLE, INC.,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Jordan v. Wren et al
as 4:2026cv00101
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Jordan, Jr.
Defendant:
Superintendent Sequeia Wren, Mike Dixon, Commissioner Burl Cain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv09282
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
Moorman v. Liaw et al
as 3:2026cv01100
Plaintiff:
Kir Moorman
Defendant:
Liaw, Mannigan, Ellis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ELLIS v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2026cv00524
Petitioner:
DIREAL ELLIS
Respondent:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and WARDEN OF FCI TERRE HAUTE FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
ELLIS v. JESTER
as 2:2026cv00069
Petitioner:
Cainan Rasheem Ellis
Respondent:
Teketa Jester
Unknown:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ELLIS v. ASPLUNDH TREE EXPERT, LLC et al
as 2:2026cv05088
Plaintiff:
TAYLOR ELLIS
Defendant:
ASPLUNDH TREE EXPERT, LLC and UTILITY TREE SERVICE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
