Cases 1 - 10 of 411
SERFASS v. JAMES et al
as 3:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
JAMES SERFASS
Defendant:
CASEY JAMES, DEANNA DELLATORRED, PATRICK NAGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Stevens v. Nagle
as 6:2024cv06353
Plaintiff:
Tracy Stevens
Defendant:
Rhonda D. Nagle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv02156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv02155
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Cook v. Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, et al.
as 24-3423
Plaintiff:
SEANTAIN COOK
Defendant:
MARICOPA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, COUNTY OF MARICOPA, CORRECTIONAL HEALTH SERVICES and others
NAGLE v. JADDOU et al
as 2:2024cv02028
Plaintiff:
DARREN NAGLE
Defendant:
UR M. JADDOU, U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES and DAVID ROARK
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1158 Immigration & Nationality Act, Section 208
McGary et al v. Inslee et al
as 2:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
Mr Darnell McGary and Ms Elizabeth McGary
Defendant:
Mr Jay Inslee, Susan Dryfus, Bob Ferguson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Stanley v. Nagle Paper Inc
as 2:2024cv10094
Plaintiff:
Blanche Stanley
Defendant:
Nagle Paper Inc Doing business as ABZAC, US
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Cincinnati Insurance Company v. Danforth et al
as 4:2023cv00900
Plaintiff:
Cincinnati Insurance Company
Defendant:
Jeffrey D Danforth, Christine M Danforth, Samantha J Schweinfurth and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01875
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
