Cases 1 - 10 of 1,843
Carigaba et al v. Philips Respironics, Inc.
as 2:2024cv04091
Plaintiff:
Noel Carigaba and Airyne Bautista
Defendant:
Philips Respironics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv02128
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Bonneau v. Unknown Hospital Administrator et al
as 6:2024cv00894
Petitioner:
Ryan Bieber Bonneau, Ryan Bautista Bonneau and Ryan Bonneau
Respondent:
Unknown Hospital Administrator, State of Oregon and Does 1-23
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Orozco et al v. City of San Juan Bautista et al
as 5:2024cv03332
Plaintiff:
Luis Ramon Orozco and Maria Cynthia Orozco
Defendant:
City of San Juan Bautista and San Benito County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bautista v. Heavenly Foot Massage, Inc et al
as 1:2024cv02393
Plaintiff:
Nelyda Yanira Ramirez Bautista
Defendant:
Heavenly Foot Massage, Inc, Lu Alpharetta Massage, Inc, Lu Dunwoody Massage, Inc and others
Bautista Cayman Asset Company v. Centro Cardiovascular de Manati III, C.S.P., et al
as 24-1496
Plaintiff:
BAUTISTA CAYMAN ASSET COMPANY
Defendant:
CENTRO CARDIOVASCULAR DE MANATI III, C.S.P., JOSE RAMON MARTINEZ-BARROSO, VIRGEN MILAGROS RIVERA-COLON and others
Lopez-Sanchez v. Ramirez Bautista
as 7:2024cv00426
Plaintiff:
Melchor Lopez-Sanchez
Defendant:
Fortino Ramirez Bautista
Bautista v. Humble ISD et al
as 4:2024cv01744
Plaintiff:
Judith Bautista
Defendant:
Humble ISD, Robert D Sitton, Robert Scarfo and others
Bautista v. USA
as 5:2024cv00116
Petitioner:
Alexis Noe Bautista
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Del Rosario Rojas, et al. v. Miller, et al.
as 24-2732
Plaintiff:
EVELYN DEL ROSARIO ROJAS and J. ASUNCION ROJAS BAUTISTA
Defendant:
LOREN K. MILLER, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M. JADDOU and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
