Cases 21 - 30 of 12,197
Bennett v. C. R. Bard, Inc., et al.
as 24-2471
Plaintiff:
CRAIG BENNETT
Defendant:
C. R. BARD, INC., a foreign corporation and BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC., an Arizona corporation
Alexandria Bennett v. Walmart, Inc.
as 24-11199
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDRIA BENNETT
Defendant:
WALMART, INC.
JONES v. WARDEN et al
as 1:2024cv00683
Plaintiff:
DAVID MICHAEL JONES
Defendant:
WARDEN, BENNETT, OFFICERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cheeks et al v. Dearborn Heights Police Department et al
as 2:2024cv11010
Plaintiff:
Gerald Cheeks and G'Kylah Cheeks
Defendant:
Dearborn Heights Police Department, Beardon, Dearborn Heights School District 7 and others
Garvie v. Bennett
as 2:2024cv00531
Petitioner:
Eugene Brian Garvie
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Bryant (ID 7323) v. Wichita Police Department et al
as 5:2024cv03055
Plaintiff:
Craig M. Bryant
Defendant:
Wichita Police Department, Kansas, State of, Paul O'Mara and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bennett v. Sam's East, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00356
Plaintiff:
Sarah Bennett
Defendant:
Sam's East, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Bennett v. Perry et al
as 1:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Danny Bennett
Defendant:
J. Kevin Perry, Tyrone Oliver, C. Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRYSON v. PENFIELD ADDICTION MINISTRIES INC et al
as 3:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
IVAN BRYSON
Defendant:
PENFIELD ADDICTION MINISTRIES INC, CRYSTAL PAGE, MIKE WALKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Murphy v. Magers et al
as 2:2024cv01954
Plaintiff:
Esther Murphy
Defendant:
Dennis M. Magers and Bennett Motor Express, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
