Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 841
Conner v. USA
as 1:2024cv00131
Petitioner: Daniel Dewayne Conner
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Michael Owlfeather-Gorbey v. Ian Conners
as 24-6364
Plaintiff: MICHAEL S. GORBEY
Defendant: IAN CONNERS, FBOP Central Office Inmate Appeal Administrator
Conner v. Warden et al
as 1:2024cv00196
Plaintiff: John Henry Conner, Jr.
Defendant: Warden, Merick Garland and Colet Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Conner v. Warden Caddo Correctional
as 24-30248
Petitioner: Albertus Conner, Jr.
Respondent: Warden Caddo Correctional Center
ABDUL v. CONNER We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv21068
Plaintiff: JABBAAR MUHAAHID ABDUL
Defendant: Robert Conner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michael Williams, Jr. v. Edward Spagel, et al
as 24-1503
Plaintiff: MICHAEL BRUCE WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant: EDWARD J. SPAGEL, JR., PETER DREGALLA, BALESK and others
Debtor: TAYLOR, CITY OF ERIE POLICE DEPT.
BRITTEN v. DIXON et al
as 4:2024cv00131
Plaintiff: CORDERRO R BRITTEN
Defendant: RICKY D DIXON, CONNER and SPREAKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McLemore v. Grisham et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2024cv03039
Plaintiff: Jeffrey L. McLemore
Defendant: Jodi Grisham, Conner Geese and (fnu) Villaneuva
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conner v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00268
Plaintiff: **Sanctioned/Barred* Albertus Conner, Jr
Defendant: Caddo Correctional Center and Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ABDUL v. CONNER We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2024cv00082
Petitioner: JABBAAR MUHAAHID ABDUL and JABBAAR MUJAAHID ABDUL
Respondent: ROBERT CONNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?