Cases 1 - 10 of 11,601
Carey v. Guard Force International, Inc.
as 1:2024cv21942
Plaintiff:
Jeremy T. Carey
Defendant:
Guard Force International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Glenn et al v. Meta Platforms, Inc.
as 3:2024cv03028
Plaintiff:
Ashley Glenn, Terrie Hood, Kylie Sorge and others
Defendant:
Meta Platforms Inc.
STRIPLIN v. WRAY et al
as 1:2024cv01437
Plaintiff:
AAREN WILLIAMS STRIPLIN
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER A. WRAY, KAMALA D. HARRIS, LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III and others
Hult v. Carey et al
as 9:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Ernie Gustav Hult
Defendant:
Erin Carey and BLM Field Office
Geyer et al v. Montgomery as trustee of the Trust Agreement of Judith D. Plair dated August 19, 2003
as 3:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Amanda Geyer, Robert Plair and Tina Carey
Defendant:
Rebecca Montgomery as trustee of the Trust Agreement of Judith D. Plair dated August 19, 2003
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Carey v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01784
Plaintiff:
Jana Carey
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-11560
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00709
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
CAREY v. PETERS et al
as 3:2024cv00099
Petitioner:
THOMAS J. CAREY, JR.
Respondent:
COLETTE S. PETERS and MICHAEL UNDERWOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Concholakeland Homeowners Association et al v. Apache, County of et al
as 3:2024cv08093
Plaintiff:
Concholakeland Homeowners Association and Joseph Lathus
Defendant:
Apache, County of, Apache County Sheriff's Office, Apache County Recorder's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
