Cases 1 - 10 of 863
Gustafson v. Primis Bank
as 3:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Paul Gustafson
Defendant:
Primis Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
TALBERT v. IRWIN et al
as 2:2024cv00675
Plaintiff:
CHARLES TALBERT
Defendant:
RANDY IRWIN, JOHN BLICHA, IAN GUSTAFSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Konecny v. State of Texas, et al
as 24-1091
Plaintiff:
J. ALAN KONECNY, AKA Alan J. Konecny
Defendant:
STATE OF TEXAS, COLLIN COUNTY TEXAS, TARRANT COUNTY TEXAS and others
John Doe v. Priscilla A. Madrid et al
as 8:2024cv00909
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Priscilla A. Madrid, Thomas Vasquez, William Earl Baker, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
WALLACE v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
SHAWN WALLACE
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, HARRY, L. HARRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Niekamp et al. v. Watts Guerra LLP et al. *** REMINDER TO COUNSEL -- This case is a tag-a-long action to 14-md-2591, MDL 2591 In Re: Syngenta AG MIR162 Corn Litigation.***
as 2:2024cv02146
Plaintiff:
Christopher J niekamp and Randall D. Hebrink
Defendant:
Watts Guerra, LLP, Bassford Remele, PA, Gustafson Gluek, PLLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Gustafson v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
Brandon Gustafson
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
STOCKTON et al v. HARRY et al
as 1:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
RONALD STOCKTON, THOMAS W. MCCUNE, BRIAN NELSON and others
Defendant:
LAUREL HENRY, SUPERINTENDANT R. IRWIN, DEPUTY SUPT. I. GUSTAFSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
STOCKTON v. HARRY et al
as 1:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
RONALD STOCKTON
Defendant:
LAUREL HARRY, G. LETTLE, G. LITTLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
