Cases 1 - 10 of 1,744
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00272
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Weeks v. Arkansas Division of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
Paul Michael Weeks
Defendant:
Arkansas Division of Corrections, Thomas W Hurst, Brandon Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Hurst et al
as 2:2024cv11155
Plaintiff:
Eric Martin
Defendant:
Robert Hurst, Erane Washington, Rachel L. McDuffie and others
Hurst v. State Farm Lloyds
as 1:2024cv00152
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Hurst
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Hurst v. Target Corp of Minnesota
as 6:2024cv00570
Plaintiff:
Lori Hurst
Defendant:
Target Corporation of Minnesota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Buchanan v. Roberts et al
as 3:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Christopher Buchanan
Defendant:
Roberts, Bata, Thomas Hurst and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Swift v. Dunagan et al
as 3:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Lawrence J Swift
Defendant:
Heath Dunagan, Clint Baker, John C Haynes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hurst v. Dreyer's Grand Ice Cream Inc
as 4:2024cv02314
Plaintiff:
Ramon Hurst
Defendant:
Dreyer's Grand Ice Cream, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Jones v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00345
Plaintiff:
Keithen L Jones
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Dale Reed, Raymond Naylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pyle et al v. United States of America Department of Housing and Urban Development
as 3:2024cv00345
Plaintiff:
Michelle B. Pyle, Jennifer L. Payne and Tammie E. Hurst
Defendant:
United States of America Department of Housing and Urban Development
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
