Cases 121 - 130 of 48,990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01857
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Demajio Ellis v. Linda Carper, et al
as 24-1755
Plaintiff:
DEMAJIO J. ELLIS
Defendant:
LINDA CARPER, JOHNATHAN JACKSON, Sergeant, BRIAN MARTZ and others
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt v. Sean Paul et al
as 2:2024cv03602
Plaintiff:
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt
Defendant:
Sean Paul, Troy Donald Jamerson, Ho Chi Mihn City and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Owens et al v. Hill et al
as 1:2024cv01096
Plaintiff:
Roderick M Owens and Dwayne Jordan
Defendant:
Ricky Hill, FNU Watkins, f/n/u Gross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Depp
as 1:2024cv00199
Plaintiff:
Carmela Lynn Jackson
Defendant:
Johnny Christopher Depp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JACKSON v. UNKNOWN MAKER OF ZANTAC RANITIDINE et al
as 2:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
Roy Wayne Jackson, Jr.
Defendant:
UNKNOWN MAKER OF ZANTAC RANITIDINE, CMC Pharmacy and University Texas Medical Branch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Powell v. Jackson County Schneck Memorial Hospital et al
as 3:2024cv00353
Plaintiff:
FAWN POWELL
Defendant:
Jackson County Schneck Memorial Hospital doing business as MAJESTIC CARE OF SOUTH BEND and MAJESTIC CARE OF SOUTH BEND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jackson v. Pitt
as 1:2024cv00200
Plaintiff:
Carmela Lynn Jackson
Defendant:
William Brad Pitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024vv00678
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Jackson v. City of Stockton et al
as 2:2024cv01219
Plaintiff:
Darryl Jackson
Defendant:
City of Stockton and Anthony Perry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
