Cases 31 - 40 of 2,159
Verdugo v. 7-Eleven, Inc. et al
as 1:2023at01057
Plaintiff:
Jose Lugo Verdugo
Defendant:
7-Eleven, Inc. and Does 1 - 100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America v. G&J General Contractor, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00885
Plaintiff:
Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America
Defendant:
G&J General Contractor, Alejandro Lugo Hernandez, Brian Tallent and others
Lugo v. Swing
as 2:2023cv02095
Plaintiff:
Eliseo Frijol Lugo
Defendant:
Sherry Dudley Swing
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
George Alexander Lugo v. City of Dana Point et al
as 8:2023cv02353
Plaintiff:
George Alexander Lugo
Defendant:
City of Dana Point, Dana Point Police, Officer Hodges and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Castro Lugo et al v. D I A Deli Grocery Corp. et al
as 1:2023cv10597
Plaintiff:
Ronald Lisandro Castro Lugo
Defendant:
D I A Deli Grocery Corp. doing business as Dia Deli Grocery, Alex Perdomo and Yesenia Perdomo
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Hegge v. Inslee et al
as 2:2023cv00346
Plaintiff:
Alvin Hegge and Alvin L Hegge
Defendant:
Jay Inslee, Robert Ferguson, Todd Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-13904
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mahoney et al v. Bowers et al
as 4:2023cv40167
Plaintiff:
Brian E. Mahoney and George Curran
Defendant:
Bowers, Patricia Ruze, Dr. Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Lugo
as 23-3687
Defendant / Appellant:
NOE RENE LUGO, No-No and Wolfie
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Mota-Lugo v. Garland
as 23-3526
Petitioner:
RODMAN EMIR MOTA-LUGO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
