Cases 1 - 10 of 6,127
United States v. Humberto Rivera-Moreno
as 24-1969
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Humberto Rivera-Moreno, also known as Beto, also known as Erik Moctezuma, also known as Erik Moctezuma-Espindola, also known as Eduardo Rivera-Moreno, also known as Jose Chavez
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00512
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Carr v. Redwood Credit Union et al
as 3:2024cv02700
Plaintiff:
Deaudry Eugene Carr, Jr.
Defendant:
Redwood Credit Union, Kim Odeh, Nguyen Fong and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Moreno v. Indivior, Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65424
Plaintiff:
Raquel E. Moreno
Defendant:
Indivior, Inc., Indivior Solutions, Inc., Indivior PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gutierrez et al v. Dona Ana County Board of Commissioners et al
as 2:2024cv00428
Plaintiff:
Raymond Gutierrez, Sabrina Gutierrez, J. G. and others
Defendant:
Dona Ana County Board of Commissioners, Christopher Moreno, David Dominguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moreno Hinostroza, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2783
Petitioner:
KARINA MORENO HINOSTROZA, FABIOLA NAOMI CANCHAYA MORENO and DAYLIN XIOMARA CANCHAYA MORENO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Moreno v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00251
Plaintiff:
Ciro Moreno
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Boyd et al v. Moreno et al
as 2:2024cv00140
Defendant:
Luis Moreno, Moshe Ben Mor and Kelli Jo Moreno
Plaintiff:
Richard Dean Boyd and Valerie Boyd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Dougherty et al v. Whitehorse Freight, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
Mark Dougherty, Parker Roth, Marcus Moreno and others
Defendant:
Whitehorse Freight, LLC and Michael Bilokonsky
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
