Cases 41 - 50 of 66
Tenorio v. Pitzer, et al
as 1:2012cv01295
Plaintiff:
Russell Tenorio
Defendant:
Brian Pitzer , Raymond D. Schultz and City of Albuquerque
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Irving Hage et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv09998
Defendant:
AAI Development Services Inc, AAIPharma Inc, AAIPharma LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Oliver Aguayo, Helen Archibold, Derek Berman and others
Straw Hat IP Holdings LLC v. Morristhorn Inc et al
as 2:2012cv09683
Defendant:
Does, M and L Brar LLC, Siamak Mehrmand and others
Plaintiff:
Straw Hat IP Holdings LLC
SYNTHES USA SALES, LLC v. PITZER
as 2:2012cv06272
Plaintiff:
SYNTHES USA SALES, LLC
Defendant:
CHRISTIAN PITZER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Misappropriation of Trade Secrets
Pitzer v. USA
as 4:2012cv00070
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Shannon Lee Pitzer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Pitzer v. Smith et al
as 2:2011cv12643
Plaintiff:
Steven J Pitzer
Defendant:
Jimmie Smith and Robert Rodgers, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Nikita Goffney v. J. Sauceda, et al
as 11-20152
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NIKITA VAN GOFFNEY
Defendant - Appellee:
J SAUCEDA, C DAVIDSON, T TAYLOR and others
Pitzer v. Houston et al
as 4:2011cv03028
Respondent:
Dennis Bakewell and Robert Houston
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Petitioner:
Matthew J. Pitzer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pitzer v. County of Antelope, Nebraska et al
as 4:2011cv03011
Defendant:
County of Antelope, Nebraska, Heather McWhorter and Eugene Schaaf
Plaintiff:
Lavonne Pitzer
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Pitzer v. County of Antelope, Nebraska et al
as 4:2011cv03012
Defendant:
County of Antelope, Nebraska, Heather McWhorter and Eugene Schaaf
Plaintiff:
Lavonne Pitzer
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
