Cases 31 - 40 of 25,112
Jesse Perez v. Mohammed Siddiqui
as 24-1766
Plaintiff:
JESSE R. PEREZ
Defendant:
MOHAMMED SIDDIQUI, Medical Director, Wexford
Lopez Arostegui, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2787
Petitioner:
LESTER PASCUAL LOPEZ AROSTEGUI, ALBA NUBIA RIOS PEREZ and LESLY DARIANA LOPEZ RIOS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Spangler v. Echevarria et al
as 1:2024cv01899
Plaintiff:
Walter Spangler
Defendant:
Victor Perez Echevarria, Santiago Brothers, Inc. and Progressive Express Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Perez v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03530
Plaintiff:
Maria C. Perez
Defendant:
Commissioner Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
PEREZ v. REAGLE
as 1:2024cv00755
Petitioner:
OSCAR PEREZ
Respondent:
CHRISTINA REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dowling v. United States Attorney's Office
as 5:2024cv00447
Plaintiff:
Angela D. Dowling and Angela Perez Dowling
Defendant:
United States Attorney's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Perez v. Fairfax County
as 1:2024cv00727
Plaintiff:
Zenaida Perez
Defendant:
Fairfax County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Caruthers v. Rockingham Regional Jail Medical Department et al
as 7:2024cv00291
Plaintiff:
William H. Caruthers
Defendant:
Rockingham Regional Jail Medical Department, Officer Perez, Officer Morbin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Rodriguez (Fernandez Colon)
as 24-1157
Defendant:
ERIC MANUEL FERNANDEZ COLON, ABEL MONTILLA, DANIEL RODRIGUEZ and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Perez Hernandez, et al. v. Miller, et al.
as 24-2734
Plaintiff:
JESUS ANTONIO PEREZ HERNANDEZ and JUAN CARLOS VAZQUEZ AVILA
Defendant:
LOREN K. MILLER, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M. JADDOU and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
