Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Marshall v. English, et al
as 21-3101
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN DOE (4), Blind IRS Employee/Undercover Person, in his individual and official capacity, TOMMIE TURNER, Client/Associate/Stakeholder-Wizard Services/Joe Marshall's Companies, in his individual capacity, Estate of Travis Johnson, JOHN CORNELIUS, IRS Special Agent, Criminal Investigation Division, Austin, Texas, in his individual capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JONATHAN MARSHALL, SR.
Marshall v. English et al
as 5:2020cv03190
Defendant:
W. J. Morris, Earl Leroy Yeakel, III, Craig Watkins and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Marshall, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Peter McDaniels v. Kathleen Preito, et al
as 19-35297
Defendant / Appellee:
MARCIA MCCORMICK, Job Coordinator, KATHLEEN PREITO, Call out Clerk and GARY BOHAN, CPM
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PETER J. MCDANIELS
McDaniels v. Preito et al
as 3:2017cv05801
Plaintiff:
Peter J. McDaniels
Defendant:
Kathleen Preito, Marcia McCormick and Gary Bohan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Preito v. Mentor Corporation et al
as 4:2013cv00367
Plaintiff:
Oelia Preito
Defendant:
MENTOR CORPORATION and MENTOR WORLDWIDE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Preito v. Mentor Corporation et al
as MN/0:13-cv-01923
Plaintiff:
Oelia Preito
Defendant:
Mentor Corporation and Mentor Worldwide LLC
Preito v. Mentor Corporation et al
as 0:2013cv01923
Plaintiff:
Oelia Preito
Defendant:
Mentor Corporation and Mentor Worldwide LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barrington et al v. Williams et al
as 6:2010cv01315
Plaintiff:
Deanna B. Barrington and John E. Barrington
Defendant:
Jan Warren Williams, Ricardo Preito, David J. Burkey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Garza et al v. Yuma County et al
as 2:2007cv01270
Plaintiff:
Alexa Garza, Ashley Ingraham and Alex Garza
Defendant:
Yuma County, Ralph E Ogden, Michael McGregor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
