Cases 1 - 10 of 4,162
Barfield v. Dixon et al
as 3:2024cv00601
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Barfield
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon, S. Pate, T.R. Mudd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04188
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
SCHWARTZ v. HOCKEY et al
as 1:2024cv01007
Plaintiff:
JASON SCHWARTZ
Defendant:
HOCKEY, MARTIN, A. TERRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FULLMAN v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2024cv06965
Plaintiff:
JOHN W. FULLMAN
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, BURLINGTON COUNTY PROBATION DEPARTMENT, JOANNE SCHWARTZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SCHWARTZ v. HOCKEY et al
as 1:2024cv00965
Plaintiff:
JASON SCHWARTZ
Defendant:
HOCKEY, MARTIN, A. TERRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MANCINI et al v. DELAWARE COUNTY, PA, et al
as 2:2024cv02425
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MANCINI, JOY SCHWARTZ, GREGORY STENSTROM and others
Defendant:
DELAWARE COUNTY, PA and DELAWARE COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gormley (PS) v. Khanzada et al
as 1:2024cv01534
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Gormley and Kathleen Mary Gormley
Defendant:
Abdul Khanzada, Brittany Khanzada, Tony and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell-Schwartz v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02298
Plaintiff:
Ainslie Campbell-Schwartz
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Teva Womens Health, LLC, Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Schwartz v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02830
Plaintiff:
Laura Schwartz
Defendant:
Davol Inc and CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
