Cases 1 - 10 of 131
Claudia Marian Sharp v. Martin O Malley
as 5:2024cv00862
Plaintiff:
Claudia Marian Sharp
Defendant:
Martin O Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Sharp v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv05231
Plaintiff:
Tamara Sharp
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
SHARPE v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2024cv04067
Plaintiff:
WESLEY JOHN SHARPE
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Sharp v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00145
Plaintiff:
Jerold Sharp
Defendant:
Comm. of Soc. Sec. Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Sharpe v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 5:2024cv05028
Plaintiff:
Kinlee Sharpe
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
(SS) Sharp v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv01144
Plaintiff:
Michael Joseph Sharp
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Sharp v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023at00645
Plaintiff:
Michael Joseph Sharp
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Sharp v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2023cv06361
Plaintiff:
Justin Sharp
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
SHARP v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00103
Plaintiff:
WHITNEY L. SHARP
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Sharpe v. SSA
as 6:2023cv00005
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Stuart Sharpe
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
