Cases 21 - 30 of 27,404
Wren v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00428
Plaintiff:
Willow Wren
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01729
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Sharp v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65359
Plaintiff:
Brian Sharp
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Darex, LLC v. Smith's Consumer Products, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00397
Plaintiff:
Darex, LLC doing business as Work Sharp
Defendant:
Smith's Consumer Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
(HC) Sharp v. Borla
as 1:2024cv00326
Petitioner:
Anthony Andre Sharp
Respondent:
Edward Borla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Claudia Marian Sharp v. Martin O Malley
as 5:2024cv00862
Plaintiff:
Claudia Marian Sharp
Defendant:
Martin O Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
McPherson v. Benedict et al
as 6:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Brentrez Jarmykus McPherson and Royal Great Levi King - Chief Levi Priest Yaheshiah
Defendant:
Pope Benedict, Department of Corrections, Georgia Dept. of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Camus, et al. v. Sharp Healthcare
as 24-2520
Plaintiff:
HANNAH COUSIN, DEANNA FRANKLIN-PITTMAN, LINDA CAMUS and others
Defendant:
SHARP HEALTHCARE
Malloy v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00400
Plaintiff:
Melissa Malloy
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SHARP v. DEPARTMENT OF VETERAN AFFAIRS,
as 1:2024cv01144
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY SHARP
Defendant:
BOARD OF APPEALS DEPARTMENT OF VETERAN AFFAIRS,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
