Cases 1 - 10 of 140
In Re: Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether ("MTBE") Products Liability Litigation
as 1:2000cv01898
Plaintiff:
All Plaintiffs, American Distilling & Manufacturing Co., Inc., Melanie J. Arcure and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Chevron U.S.A., Inc., Coastal Oil New England, Inc., Getty Properties Corp. and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Citgo Petroleum Corporation, Kewanee Industries Inc., Chevron Puerto Rico LLC and others
Defendant:
Citgo Refining and Chemical Company, L.P., Citgo Refining and Chemicals Company L.P., Coastal Eagle Point Oil Company and others
Cross Claimant:
El Paso Corporation, Lyondell Chemical Company, Ultramar Energy, Inc. and others
Petitioner:
Flint Hills Resources, LP, Claudia Christiansen and Hamner institutes for health science, the
4Th Party Plaintiff:
Northville Industries Corp.
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Town of Kouts, United Water New York, Inc. and Village of Bethalto
Consolidated Defendant:
Valero Refining Company Texas, L.P., Ashland, Inc., Exxon Mobil Oil Coroporation and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
A&A McHenry, Inc., Chestnut Mart of Newburgh, Inc., Chestnut Petroleum Dist., Inc. and others
Cross Defendant:
Amerada Hess Corporation, American Refining Group Inc.'s, Buckley Energy Group, Ltd. and others
4Th Party Defendant:
Ibrahim Aykanat, George Chapklin, Jr., Stephen Chapklin and others
Special Master:
Ronald J. Hedges, Kenneth E. Warner, Kieran Gostin and others
Appellant:
The State of New Hampshire
Intervenor:
United States
Not Classified By Court:
Experimental Pathology Laboratories, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452 R&R re motions to remand (non-core)
City of Camden et al v. 3M Company
as 2:2023cv03147
Plaintiff:
City of Camden, City of Brockton, City of Sioux Falls and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Interested Party:
State of Colorado, State of Hawaii, State of Maine and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Brookfield Property Retail Holding LLC et al v. Dillard Texas Central LLC
as 3:2023cv01674
Plaintiff:
Brookfield Property Retail Holding LLC, Town East Mall LLC, Brookfield Property REIT Inc. and others
Defendant:
Dillard Texas Central LLC
Not Classified By Court:
ADR Provider
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Yarbrough v. Broome County, New York et al
as 3:2023cv00671
Plaintiff:
Sara-Judith: Yarbrough
Defendant:
Broome County, New York, Town of Barker, New York, Jason T. Garnar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
B. Williams v. Lobel Financial Corporation et al
as 8:2023cv00723
Defendant:
Zenen Vargas, Fox Recovery Services, Marina Molina and others
Plaintiff:
B. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
FOXX et al v. DOUGLAS et al
as 1:2023cv00205
Plaintiff:
DARRELL FOXX, DUNBAR DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LLC and PAUL L. DUNBAR GROUP, INC.
Defendant:
MICHAEL DOUGLAS, CHRISTOPHER CURRY, MAYOR BARBRA MALLET and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Town of Tewksbury v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2022cv04555
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Inc, Raytheon Technologies Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Town of Tewksbury
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Town of Tewksbury v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2022cv12025
Plaintiff:
Tewksbury, Town of and Town of Tewksbury
Defendant:
3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co.), Angus Fire, AGC CHEMICAL AMERICAS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Town of Webster v. 3M Company et al
as 4:2022cv11496
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Inc., Raytheon Technologies Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Town of Webster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Town of West Bridgewater v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2022cv11498
Plaintiff:
Town of West Bridgewater
Defendant:
3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co.), Angus Fire, AGC CHEMICAL AMERICAS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
