Cases 11 - 20 of 188
Valle Arrizon et al v. Wolf et al
as 1:2020cv00788
Defendant:
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Daniel Renaud, Unknown Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Efren Valle Arrizon and Gonzalo Valle Arrizon
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Michael Sullivan v. Karen Carrington, et al
as 20-5666
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSEPH L. PARHAM, UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, LUCAS A. JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL C. SULLIVAN
Umar Muhammad v. Bonita Hoffner, et al
as 19-2009
Defendant / Appellee:
INSPECTOR HOUGH, JEFF WOODS, A. LONG and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UMAR MUHAMMAD
Umar Muhammad v. Bonita Hoffner, et al
as 19-1805
Defendant / Appellee:
INSPECTOR HOUGH, JEFF WOODS, A. LONG and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UMAR MUHAMMAD
Sosa et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv01331
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Ernesto Valles Acevedo and Juanita C. Sosa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sullivan v. US Office of General Counsel et al (JRG2)
as 2:2019cv00049
Defendant:
Joan M Rizkallah, Javier Valles, David Ferrell and others
Plaintiff:
Michael C Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Valle v. Carefirst of Maryland, Inc. dba Carefirst Blue Cross Blue Shield et al
as 2:2018cv14065
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Conduent Payment Integrity Solutions and Carefirst of Maryland, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Ashley Valle
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Kirschke #384285 v. Forrester et al
as 2:2018cv00224
Plaintiff:
Moses R. Kirschke #384285
Defendant:
Jackie Mertaugh, Rachelle Valle, Pam Ellis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Valles v. Milewski et al
as 5:2018cv02854
Defendant:
Gregory Moenich, Michael Orrand, City of Akron and others
Plaintiff:
Raul A. Valles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Valles v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv01583
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jose Valles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
