Cases 1 - 10 of 2,591
Clark v. Hartmann et al
as 4:2024cv03092
Plaintiff:
Kenneth W. Clark
Defendant:
Klaus Hartmann, Brittani E. Lewit, Kristi Egger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clark v. Barber et al
as 4:2024cv03093
Plaintiff:
Kenneth W Clark
Defendant:
David Barber, John A. Vik, Kingswood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clark v. Reuter et al
as 4:2024cv03091
Plaintiff:
Kenneth W Clark
Defendant:
Rodney Reuter, John A. Vik, Kingswood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mayfield v. City of College Station
as 24-20213
Plaintiff:
Helen Tyne Mayfield and James Campbell
Defendant:
City of College Station, City of Bryan, Brazos County and others
Frank Reid v. Corizon Health Services
as 24-6422
Plaintiff:
FRANK REID
Defendant:
CORIZON HEALTH SERVICES, Virginia Department of Corrections Contract Medical Provider, J. BLEDSOE, Red Onion State Prison Medical Administrator, DOCTOR FOX, Red Onion State Prison Physician and others
Jesus Jehovah v. Harold Clarke
as 24-6428
Plaintiff:
JESUS EMMANUEL JEHOVAH, a/k/a Robert Gabriel Love, a/k/a Gabriel Alexander Antonio
Defendant:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, A. DAVID ROBINSON, Deputy Director, COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA and others
Michael Dobson v. Dr. Thompson
as 24-6403
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DOBSON
Defendant:
DR. THOMPSON, HAROLD W. CLARKE, STEVEN HERRICK and others
Michael Peterson v. Harold Clarke
as 24-6179
Petitioner:
MICHAEL ANDREW PETERSON
Respondent:
HAROLD W. CLARKE
Wood v. Clarke et al
as 1:2024cv00404
Plaintiff:
James R. Wood
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Steve Herrick, J.D. Oates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel Jamison v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-6132
Plaintiff:
DANIEL W. PHOENIX, a/k/a Daniel W. Jamison
Defendant:
CHADWICK DOTSON, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, MARK AMONETTE, M.D., Chief Medical Officer, NATARCHA GREGG, M.S.A., RD., State Wide Dietician and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
