Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Lucinda LC v. Jay Som
as 26-1442
Plaintiff:
LUCINDA LC, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and JUNE WHEATLEY
Defendant:
JAY SOM, in his official capacity as Member of the Virginia Fair Housing Board, KEMPER FUNKHOUSER, in his official capacity as Member of the Virginia Real Estate Board, CAVELLE MOLLINEAUX, in his official capacity as Member of the Virginia Real Estate Board and others
Amicus Curiae:
LIBERTY JUSTICE CENTER, THE MANHATTAN INSTITUTE, POVERTY & RACE RESEARCH ACTION COUNSEL and others
Martha Camire, et al v. Alcoa USA Corp., et al
as 26-7035
Plaintiff:
Martha Brennan Camire, Craig Jefferson, David Lyn Shepherd and others
Defendant:
Alcoa USA Corp., Alcoa Corp., Alcoa Benefits Management Committee and others
Amicus Curiae:
AARP and AARP Foundation
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., et al v. Robert Kennedy, Jr., et al
as 25-5425
Plaintiff:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc and Teva Neuroscience, Inc.
Defendant:
Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., in his official capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services and Mehmet Oz, in his official capacity as Administrator of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
Amicus Curiae:
Association for Accessible Medicines, Bausch Health Companies, Inc., Bristol Myers Squibb Company and others
Bruce Konya v. Lockheed Martin Corporation
as 25-2061
Plaintiff:
BRUCE KONYA, SIMON SHIFF, DIANA VASQUEZ, individually and as representatives of a class of participants and beneficiaries on behalf of the Lockheed Martin Corporation Salaried Employee Retirement Program and the Lockheed Martin Aerospace Hourly Pension Plan and others
Defendant:
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICAN COUNCIL OF LIFE INSURERS, THE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MANUFACTURERS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00110
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00498
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Neuhtah Opiotennione v. Bozzuto Management Company
as 21-1919
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NEUHTAH OPIOTENNIONE
Plaintiff:
HOUSING RIGHTS INITIATIVE
Defendant / Appellee:
BOZZUTO MANAGEMENT COMPANY, GREYSTAR MANAGEMENT SERVICES, L.P., KETTLER MANAGEMENT INC. and others
Defendant:
FAIRFIELD RESIDENTIAL COMPANY LLC
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION, LAWYERS' COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS UNDER LAW, NATIONAL FAIR HOUSING ALLIANCE and others
ORG for Black Struggle, et al v. John Ashcroft
as 20-3121
Defendant:
Greene County Clerk's Office, St. Charles County Election Authority, Jackson County Election Board and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Missouri Faith Voices, St. Louis A. Philip Randolph Institute, National Council of Jewish Women, St. Louis and others
Defendant / Appellant:
John R. Ashcroft, in his official capacity as Missouri Secretary of State
Amicus Curiae:
AARP Foundation and AARP
People First of Alabama, et al v. Secretary of State, et al
as 20-13695
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BLACK VOTERS MATTER CAPACITY BUILDING INSTITUTE, GREATER BIRMINGHAM MINISTRIES, HOWARD PORTER, JR. and others
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Defendant / Appellant:
DON DAVIS, SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ALABAMA and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF KENTUCKY, STATE OF KANSAS, STATE OF TEXAS and others
Organization for Black Struggle et al v. Ashcroft et al
as 2:2020cv04184
Defendant:
Greene County Clerk's Office, John R. Ashcroft, St. Charles County Election Authority and others
Plaintiff:
Missouri Faith Voices, National Council of Jewish Women St. Louis Section, St. Louis A. Philip Randolph Institute and others
Amicus Curiae:
AARP and AARP Foundation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
