Cases 31 - 40 of 489
Robert Espinoza v. Union of American Physicians and Dentists, AFSCME, et al
as 22-55331
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT ESPINOZA
Defendant / Appellee:
UNION OF AMERICAN PHYSICIANS AND DENTISTS, AFSCME LOCAL 206, CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE SERVICES, BETTY T. YEE, in her official capacity as California State Controller and others
AFSCME Maryland Council 3 v. State of Maryland
as 22-1362
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WAYNE BRIDGETT, KENNETH FITCH, PHYLIS REINARD and others
Appellant:
AFSCME MARYLAND COUNCIL 3
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF MARYLAND, GOVERNOR LARRY HOGAN, SECRETARY DAVID R. BRINKLEY and others
JONES et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2022cv00838
Plaintiff:
KEVIN M. JONES and JAMIL SMITH
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, LOCAL 159 AFSCME DISTRICT COUNCIL 33, DAVID ROBINSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Donohue v. Madison
as 22-437
Petitioner:
Danny Donohue, as President of the Civil Service Employees Association, Inc., Local 1000, Civil Service Employees Association, Inc., Local 1000, AFSCME, AFL - CIO, John Dellio, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Respondent:
Thomas J. Madison, Jr., Individually and in his official capacity as Executive Director of the New York State Thruway Authority and the New York State Canal Corporation, Carlos Millan, in his official capacity as Director of Employee Relations and Employee Safety, New York State Thruway Authority and New York State Canal Corporation, Howard P. Milstein, Individually and in his official capacity as Chairman of New York State Thruway/Canal Corporation Board of Directors and others
Donohue v. Madison
as 22-435
Petitioner:
Danny Donohue, as President of the Civil Service Employees Association, Inc., Local 1000, AFSCME, AFL-CIO, Civil Service Employees Association, Inc., Local 1000, AFSCME, AFL-CIO, William Coleman, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Respondent:
Thomas J. Madison, Jr., in his official capacity as Executive Director of the New York State Thruway Authority and the New York State Canal Corporation, Carlos Millian, in his official capacity as Director of Employee Relations and Employee Safety, New York State Thruway Authority and New York State Canal Corporation;, Brian U. Stratton, in his official capacity as Director of the New York State Canal Corporation and others
Lascano v. AFSCME, Ohio Council 8 et al
as 1:2022cv00102
Plaintiff:
Margaret Lascano
Defendant:
AFSCME, Ohio Council 8 and City of Cincinnati
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Garland et al v. New York City Fire Department et al
as 1:2021cv06586
Plaintiff:
John Garland, Vincent A Bottalico, Timothy A Heaton and others
Defendant:
New York City Fire Department, Daniel A Nigro, John Doe #1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Robert Espinoza v. Union of American Physicians and Dentists, AFSCME Local 206 et al
as 8:2021cv01898
Plaintiff:
Robert Espinoza
Defendant:
Union of American Physicians and Dentists, AFSCME Local 206, California Correctional Healthcare Services, Betty T Yee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AFSCME Council 4 et al v. Garland et al
as 3:2021cv01524
Plaintiff:
AFSCME Council 4, Connecticut Police and Fire Union, National Association of Government Employees, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Merrick Garland and United States Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Mason et al v. District Council 1707, American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (DC 1707, AFSCME) et al
as 1:2021cv09382
Plaintiff:
Janice Mason, Thomas Murray, Rafael Sencion and others
Defendant:
District Council 1707, American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (DC 1707, AFSCME) and American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
