Cases 1 - 10 of 486
Spann v. Stange
as 1:2024cv00095
Petitioner:
Jihad Ahmad Spann
Respondent:
Bill Stange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Foust v. Ahadzia et al
as 2:2024cv00950
Plaintiff:
Carl Foust
Defendant:
Ahmad Ahadzia, Qingbo Sui, D. Minnatee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Erakat v. Department of Treasury Internal Revenue Service et al
as 1:2024cv00350
Plaintiff:
Ahmad Erakat
Defendant:
Department of Treasury Internal Revenue Service, Ogden, Utaha and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Tounisi v. United States of America et al
as 1:2024cv01401
Plaintiff:
Abdella Ahmad Tounisi
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRIS v. USA
as 1:2023cv01052
Petitioner:
RAMEL AHMAD HARRIS
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Hamlin v. Horn et al
as 1:2023cv00708
Plaintiff:
Ahmad Hamlin
Defendant:
Sgt. Matthew Horn, Mercer County Commission, City of Princeton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ahmad v. State of New York City et al
as 1:2023cv07957
Plaintiff:
Nicholls Ahmad
Defendant:
State of New York City and Police Department 69th Precinct
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ahmad v. State of New York City et al
as 1:2023cv08626
Plaintiff:
Nicholls Ahmad
Defendant:
State of New York City and Police Department 69th Precinct
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Titus Willis v. Corizon Healthcare of Michigan, et al
as 23-1799
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TITUS C. WILLIS
Defendant / Appellee:
CORIZON HEALTHCARE OF MICHIGAN, aka Corizon Health, Inc., DUWANE WATERS HOSPITAL, INC., HENRY FORD ALLEGIANCE HOSPITAL, INC. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
