Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Rogers et al v. Airgas USA, LLC
as 5:2024cv02360
Plaintiff:
Timothy Rogers and Jason Fong
Defendant:
Airgas USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BWS Properties, LLC v. Airgas USA, LLC
as 1:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
BWS Properties, LLC
Defendant:
Airgas USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
G B Sciences Louisiana L L C v. Airgas U S A L L C et al
as 3:2023cv01523
Plaintiff:
GB SCIENCES LOUISIANA, LLC and G B Sciences Louisiana L L C
Defendant:
AIRGAS USA, LLC, Airgas U S A L L C and Midsouth Airgas USA L L C
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Contract Dispute
Airgas USA, LLC v John Zink Company, LLC
as 4:2020cv00605
Plaintiff:
Airgas USA, LLC
Defendant:
John Zink Company, LLC doing business as John Zink Hamworthy Combustion
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Airgas USA, LLC v. Rolan Plant Services, Inc.
as 4:2019cv04292
Defendant:
Rolan Plant Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Airgas USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Solamed O2, LLC v. Airgas USA, LLC
as 2:2019cv05762
Plaintiff:
Solamed O2, LLC
Defendant:
Airgas USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Upstate Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery PA v. AirGas USA LLC
as 7:2019cv02889
Plaintiff:
Upstate Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery PA
Defendant:
AirGas USA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lit'l Pepper Gourmet, Inc. v. Airgas USA, LLC
as 3:2019cv00837
Plaintiff:
Lit'l Pepper Gourmet, Inc.
Defendant:
Airgas USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 dtp
TALLAHASSEE PEDIATRIC DENTISTRY PLLC v. AIRGAS USA LLC
as 4:2019cv00199
Defendant:
Airgas USA, LLC and AIRGAS USA LLC
Plaintiff:
Tallahassee Pediatric Dentistry, PLLC and TALLAHASSEE PEDIATRIC DENTISTRY PLLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Airgas USA, LLC v. Glen's, LLC
as 1:2018cv00719
Defendant:
Glen's, LLC
Plaintiff:
Airgas USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
