Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Williams v. First Transit/CT Transit
as 23-8029
Plaintiff / Appellant:
APRIL L. WILLIAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
FIRST TRANSIT, INC., CT TRANSIT, H.N.S. MANAGEMENT CO., INC. and others
Defendant:
FIRST TRANSIT/CT TRANSIT
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00090
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
ECHEVARRIA v. COUNTY OF ESSEX et al
as 2:2021cv16609
Plaintiff:
MOISES ECHEVARRIA
Defendant:
COUNTY OF ESSEX, ESSEX COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ESSEX COUNTY ADULT CORRECTIONS CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ALEXANDER v. ESSEX COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, "EECF" et al
as 2:2021cv04580
Defendant:
MEDICAL DIRECTOR OF MONMOUTH COUNTY, CFG MEDICAL SERVICES, MEDICAL DIRECTOR OF ESSEX COUNTY and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ALEXANDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edward Montgomery v. Aparatis Dist Co, et al
as 14-3257
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD JEFFREY MONTGOMERY
Defendant:
APARATIS DIST CO, AL ORTIZ, D. FAUNCE and others
Defendant - Appellee:
DR. ANNICETTE
Ortiz v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv05467
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc. and Merck Sharpe & Dohme Corporation
Plaintiff:
Al Ortiz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
MONTGOMERY v. APARATIS DIST. COMPANY et al
as 2:2013cv05382
Plaintiff:
EDWARD JEFFERY MONTGOMERY
Defendant:
APARATIS DIST. COMPANY, JOHN DOE, AL ORTIZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Al Ortiz v. John Owens
as 09-6562
Petitioner - Appellant:
AL ORTIZ
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN R OWENS, Warden FCI Williamsburg
Ortiz v. Owens
as 9:2008cv03270
Petitioner:
Al Ortiz
Respondent:
John R Owens
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv06064
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
