Cases 1 - 10 of 84
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv01153
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Duncan Joseph McNeil, III v. Duncan Joseph McNeil IV et al
as 5:2026cv03068
Plaintiff:
Duncan Joseph McNeil, III
Defendant:
Duncan Joseph McNeil, IV, Paige Josephine McNeil, Gina Marie Grabicki McNeil and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abeede Kerr v. Aduloju et al
as 6:2026cv00331
Plaintiff:
Khareem Kaywan Abeede Kerr
Defendant:
Valeda Aduloju, Troy Holland, Lavalley Andrew and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Talmadge v. Angol
as 25-2643
Petitioner:
BRETT ALAN JAMES TALMADGE
Respondent:
ANGOL, Superintendant
Talmadge v. Angol
as 3:2025cv00010
Petitioner:
Brett Alan James Talmadge
Respondent:
Angol
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State Pre-Trial)
Talmadge v. Houser
as 23-3898
Petitioner / Appellant:
BRETT ALAN JAMES TALMADGE
Respondent / Appellee:
EARL HOUSER, SUPERINTENDENT
Coddington v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv01090
Plaintiff:
Alan James Coddington
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
WATERMAN v. KEEN et al
as 2:2022cv00541
Plaintiff:
CRAIG WATERMAN
Defendant:
CHIEF SHAWN KEEN, SERGEANT JUSTIN SEARS, OFFICER ALAN JAMES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PARKER v. TERRE HAUTE POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2022cv01914
Plaintiff:
QUENTIN PARKER
Defendant:
TERRE HAUTE POLICE DEPARTMENT, SHAWN KEEN, LANCE SANDERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Violation of Due Process and Equal Protection
Talmadge v. Houser
as 3:2022cv00202
Petitioner:
Brett Alan James Talmadge
Respondent:
Earl Houser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
