Cases 1 - 10 of 12
ANDREW v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv92141
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ALVIN ANDREW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hephzibah Bates v. Irene Dicken
as 15-1643
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HEPHZIBAH BATES
Plaintiff:
IRENE ELIZABETH JENKI BATES
Defendant - Appellee:
IRENE C. DICKENS, VALERY BROWN, FAY MARIE BATES and others
Hephzibah Bates v. P. A. Nunley
as 12-1920
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HEPHZIBAH BATES
Defendant - Appellee:
P. A. LACEY NUNLEY, Deputy General Counsel, C. T. WOODY, RUEBEN DANIELS, Director and others
Gabaldon v. Stock et al
as 1:2012cv00586
Plaintiff:
Laurie A Gabaldon
Defendant:
Alvin Andrew Stock and Heartland Express Inc. of Iowa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bates v. Nunley et al
as 3:2012cv00269
Defendant:
Bryant Gumbel, Wachovia Bank/Wells Fargo, Chief Of Police and others
Plaintiff:
Hephzibah Bates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Andrews v. Rackard et al
as 4:2008cv03419
Plaintiff:
Alfonzo Alvin Andrews
Defendant:
Anthony Rackard and Edgefield County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Kelly v. Quarterman
as 08-70040
Petitioner - Appellant:
ALVIN ANDREW KELLY
Respondent - Appellee:
NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Clayton v. Attorney General, State of Florida et al
as 6:2008cv00957
Petitioner:
Alvin Andrew Clayton
Respondent:
Attorney General, State of Florida and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Reaves v. Ragin et al
as 1:2007cv01294
Plaintiff:
Alvin Andrew Reaves, Jr.
Defendant:
Quenton Ragin, Joseph Curtis, Eze Nwoji and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reaves v. Smith
as 1:2007cv00797
Plaintiff:
Alvin Andrew Reaves, Jr.
Defendant:
James Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
