Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv03619
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ali v. Agility Robotics, Inc. et al
as 4:2026cv08843
Plaintiff:
Amel Ali
Defendant:
Agility Robotics, Inc., Daniel Diez and Lauren Lindstrom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
In re: EpiPen (Epinephrine Injection, USP)
as 26-3059
Unknown:
In re: EPIPEN (EPINEPHRINE INJECTION, USP) MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Defendant:
AB DATA
Movant:
DAN POOLE
Plaintiff:
ALL CONSUMER CLASS PLAINTIFFS
Appellee:
ROSETTA SERRANO, SHANNON CLEMENTS, ANNETTE SUTORIK and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00893
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Escobar v. LYFT, Inc. et al
as 1:2025cv01901
Plaintiff:
Rita Escobar
Defendant:
Amele Bonger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Amelou San San Antonio v. Brilliance LLC
as 2:2025cv05474
Plaintiff:
Amelou San Antonio
Defendant:
Brilliance LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Fye v. Crittendon et al
as 3:2025cv00351
Plaintiff:
Trenton Davon Fye
Defendant:
Crittendon, Orth, Nolan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv01913
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statutes
Orucevic v. Liberty Mutual Insurance
as 4:2025cv00124
Plaintiff:
Amel Orucevic
Defendant:
Liberty Mutual Insurance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv62160
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
