Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv01119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. v. Sock et al
as 6:2016cv00165
Plaintiff:
The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A.
Defendant:
John Gunde Sock, Etta Wilcia Boss-Cole, Anna Claxton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Amos Financial LLC v. Gutman et al
as 1:2016cv03174
Defendant:
185 Marcy Corp., 185 Marcy LLC, A. To Z. Capital Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
Amos Financial LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Dernis et al v. Amos Financial, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv00064
Plaintiff:
George Dernis and Maria Dernis
Defendant:
Amos Financial, LLC , Zulfikar Esmail , Shamim Esmail and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Amos Financial LLC v. Kazarian, Esq. et al
as 1:2015cv13990
Plaintiff:
Amos Financial LLC
Defendant:
Charles P. Kazarian, P.C. and Charles Kazarian, Esq.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
TEPPER et al v. AMOS FINANCIAL, LLC
as 2:2015cv05834
Plaintiff:
JAMES TEPPER and ALLISON TEPPER
Defendant:
AMOS FINANCIAL, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01633
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Beets et al v. Cohn & Dussi, LLC et al
as 3:2014cv00466
Plaintiff:
Regina Beets and Lindle Beets
Defendant:
Cohn & Dussi, LLC and Amos Financial LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
AMOS FINANCIAL, LLC v. KIEBLER et al
as 2:2014cv00531
Plaintiff:
AMOS FINANCIAL, LLC
Defendant:
PAUL E. KIEBLER, IV, JOSEPH T. SVETE, KENNETH M. LAPINE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00090
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
