Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01643
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
In Re: Da Graca, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-2117
Interested Party: OSVALDO MOTA, ANDREA JOY JAMES, LUCAS VALENTIM and others
Petitioner: JOAO AMADO, FRED KAYITARE, CONROY LEWIS and others
Respondent: THOMAS M. HODGSON, in his official capacity as Bristol County Sheriff, STEVEN J. SOUZA, Superintendent Bristol County House of Corrections in his Official Capacity, CHAD F. WOLF, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security and others
Celimen Savino, et al v. Souza
as 20-1768
Interested Party: JHONY BONILLA OCHOA, KARINA ROJAS VARGAS, CARLOS CARANGUI and others
Petitioner: MARIA ALEJANDRA CELIMEN SAVINO, and all those similarly situated and JULIO CESAR MEDEIROS NEVES, and all those similarly situated
Respondent: TODD M. LYONS, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the Boston Field Office of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, STEVEN J. SOUZA, in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Bristol County House of Corrections, THOMAS M. HODGSON, in his official capacity as Bristol County Sheriff and others
Celimen Savino, et al v. Souza
as 20-1626
Respondent: IMMIGRATION CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, in his official capacity as Deputy DIrector and Senior Official Performing the Duties of the DIrector for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, THOMAS M. HODGSON, in his official capacity as Bristol County Sheriff and others
Respondent / Appellee: STEVEN J. SOUZA, in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Bristol County House of Corrections, TODD M. LYONS, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the Boston Field Office of Immigrations and Customs Enforcement and CHAD F. WOLF, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the Department of Homeland Security
Petitioner / Appellant: JULIO CESAR MEDEIROS NEVES, and all those similarly situated and MARIA ALEJANDRA CELIMEN SAVINO, and all those similarly situated
Interested Party: RICK RAEMISCH, JULIO MEDEIROS NEVES JUNIO, KARINA ROJAS VARGAS and others
Celimen Savino, et al v. Souza, et al
as 20-1564
Petitioner: JULIO CESAR MEDEIROS NEVES, and all those similarly situated and MARIA ALEJANDRA CELIMEN SAVINO, and all those similarly situated
Respondent: IMMIGRATION CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, in his official capacity as Deputy DIrector and Senior Official Performing the Duties of the DIrector for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, STEVEN J. SOUZA, in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Bristol County House of Corrections and others
Interested Party: RICK RAEMISCH, JULIO MEDEIROS NEVES JUNIO, KARINA ROJAS VARGAS and others
Miguel Diaz Ruiz v. William Barr We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-1905
Petitioner: MIGUEL ANGEL DIAZ RUIZ, a/k/a Miguel Angel Moran Diaz, a/k/a Miguel Angel Ruiz
Respondent: WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Hugo Angeles-Moran v. Loretta Lynch We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-3609
Petitioner: HUGO ANGELES-MORAN
Respondent: LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General of the United States
Moran v. Arpaio et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv00169
Defendant: Joseph M Arpaio and Maricopa, County of
Plaintiff: Ricardo Angel Moran
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moran v. Arpaio et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv01414
Plaintiff: Ricardo Angel Moran
Defendant: Joseph M Arpaio and Maricopa, County of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alejandro et al v. Before Thai, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv02802
Plaintiff: Victor Alejandro , Ramon Cabrera , Federico Hernandez and others
Defendant: Before Thai, Inc., Bdin Puangsawaasdi and John Does
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?