Cases 41 - 50 of 471
Merrick v. Shinn et al
as 2:2023cv00296
Plaintiff:
Anthony James Merrick
Defendant:
David Shinn, Dianne Miller, Unknown Party and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
GILBERTI v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv04094
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY JAMES GILBERTI
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
(HC) Williams v. Superior Court of Sacramento County
as 2:2023cv00196
Petitioner:
Anthony James Williams
Respondent:
Superior Court of Sacramento County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Superior Court of Sacramento County
as 5:2023cv00305
Petitioner:
Anthony James Williams
Respondent:
Superior Court of Sacramento County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Myers v. Talley et al
as 1:2022cv03262
Plaintiff:
Anthony James Myers
Defendant:
Director Angela Talley, Warden Gaillian, Deputy Warden Nash and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Granger v. New Iberia Parish Jail et al
as 6:2022cv06137
Plaintiff:
Anthony James Granger
Defendant:
Caretakers New Iberia Parish Jail, Correctional Officers New Iberia Parish Sheriffs Office, Medical Staff New Iberia Parish Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States v. Anthony Soman
as 22-3422
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Anthony James Soman
Merrick v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2022cv01957
Plaintiff:
Anthony James Merrick
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Arizona Department of Corrections Rehabilitation and Reentry, David Shinn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
In re: Quinn James
as 22-1846
Petitioner:
In re: QUINN ANTHONY JAMES
Respondent:
BRYAN MORRISON, Warden
Anthony Braxton v. Mrs. Erica Boggess
as 22-1989
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY JAMES BRAXTON
Defendant / Appellee:
MRS. ERICA BOGGESS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
