Cases 1 - 10 of 427
JONES v. BONNER et al
as 2:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY JONES
Defendant:
BONNER, REED, POPE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. UNITED STATES
as 1:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
CHARLES ANTHONY JONES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Marcellus French, Sr. v. Anthony Wills, et al
as 24-1338
Plaintiff:
MARCELLUS A. FRENCH, SR.
Defendant:
ANTHONY WILLS, MAJOR ROWLAND, JOSHUA A. SCHOENBECK and others
Jones v. Madison Correctional Security Management et al
as 3:2024cv00303
Plaintiff:
Shane Anthony Jones
Defendant:
Madison Correctional Security Management and Tangipahoa Parish Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bobby Johnson v. Lucas Maue, et al
as 24-1254
Plaintiff:
BOBBY JOHNSON
Defendant:
LUCAS MAUE, C/O, Menard CC, TERRANCE JACKSON, C/O, Menard CC, GARRETT GRIFFIN, C/O, Menard CC and others
Majors v. Trout et al
as 1:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Dillonger John Majors
Defendant:
Richard Trout, Sophie Machen, Unknown Reavis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henderson v. Bunn et al
as 9:2024cv00348
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Derrick Henderson
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Bunn, Sergeant Allen, Sergeant Perkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Powers #069618 v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Edmund Powers
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Ryan Thornell, John Mattos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haynes v. Pritzker et al
as 3:2023cv04069
Plaintiff:
Gregory Haynes
Defendant:
J B Pritzker, Rob Jeffreys, Anthony Wills and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. State of Iowa
as 4:2023cv00514
Petitioner:
David Anthony Jones and David Jones
Respondent:
State of Iowa
Interested Party:
Aaron Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
