Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Smith v. Scarborough et al
as 2:2024cv00905
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Tolbert Smith
Defendant:
Judge Mikell Scarborough, Charles Tolbert, Keith L. Tolbert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02760
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
Bruce v. Polk County Attorney's Office et al
as 4:2018cv00040
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bruce and Elizabeth Bruce
Defendant:
Polk County Attorney's Office, John P Sarcone, Jesse Ramirez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ashley Andrews v. Francisco Quintana
as 17-5747
Petitioner - Appellant:
ASHLEY ANDREWS
Respondent - Appellee:
FRANCISCO J. QUINTANA, Warden
Andrews v. Quintana
as 5:2017cv00209
Petitioner:
Ashley Andrews
Respondent:
Francisco Quintana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00125
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
USA v. Ashley Andrews, et al
as 14-3859
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ASHLEY ANDREWS
Andrews v. Bayer Corporation et al
as ILS/3:12-cv-11037
Plaintiff:
Ashley Andrews
Defendant:
Bayer Corporation, Bayer Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Andrews v. Bayer Corporation et al
as 3:2012cv11037
Plaintiff:
Ashley Andrews
Defendant:
Bayer Corporation, Bayer Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ashley Andrews, et al v. Robert Raphaelson, et al
as 11-16287
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ASHLEY ANDREWS and ASHTONWOOD STUD ASSOCIATES, L.P.
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT B. RAPHAELSON, LUCILLE R. RAPHAELSON and KENTUCKY BLUE STABLES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
