Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01031
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
US v. Rockwell
as 26-1390
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
KEVIN ROCKWELL
Interested Party:
JOHN DOE 2, JOHN DOE 3, JOHN DOE 4 and others
Civelli v. Mulacek
as 26-20183
Plaintiff:
Carlo Giuseppe Civelli and Aster Capital S.A. (LTD) Panama
Defendant:
Phillip Emanuel Mulacek, Michelle Mulacek Vinson, Pierre Mulacek and others
Aster Oilfield Services, Inc. v. Ritenour & Sons Construction Company,Inc.
as 2:2026cv00072
Plaintiff:
ASTER OILFIELD SERVICES, INC.
Defendant:
Ritenour & Sons Construction Company,Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv11082
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
LABORERS COMBINED FUNDS OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA v. ASTER OILFIELD SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2025cv01791
Plaintiff:
LABORERS COMBINED FUNDS OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA
Defendant:
ASTER OILFIELD SERVICES, INC. and ASTER HARDWOODS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
US v. Lingard
as 25-2085
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
BRIAN LINGARD
Interested Party:
APRIL, ASTER, ELIZA and others
Northwest Administrators Inc v. Aster Construction Services
as 2:2025cv01153
Plaintiff:
Northwest Administrators Inc
Defendant:
Aster Construction Services
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Aster Oilfield Services, Inc. v. Ritenour & Sons Construction Company,Inc.
as 2:2025cv00484
Plaintiff:
Aster Oilfield Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Ritenour & Sons Construction Company,Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv00569
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
