Cases 61 - 70 of 1,055
Avalos v. Bristol West Insurance Company
as 1:2023cv00384
Plaintiff:
Carla Avalos
Defendant:
Bristol West Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
AVALOS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv02827
Plaintiff:
ROBERT VALENTINO AVALOS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00358
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Avalos v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00469
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY JOSEPH AVALOS
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
US v. Brayan Contreras-Avalos
as 23-4048
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
BRAYAN ALEXANDER CONTRERAS-AVALOS
Roosevelt Espinosa et al v. CEVA Freight, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00659
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Espinosa, Fidelis Abaekobe, William Aguilar and others
Defendant:
CEVA Freight, LLC and Does 1-10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Avalos v. Brown
as 3:2023cv00010
Petitioner:
Filiberto Avalos
Respondent:
Warden Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Abner Avalos Quintania v. Attorney General United States of America
as 23-1124
Petitioner:
ABNER JOSUE AVALOS QUINTANIA
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Fortis Construction LLC v. Avalos
as 1:2023cv00009
Plaintiff:
Fortis Construction LLC and AMS Construction LLC
Defendant:
Thomas Avalos
3Rd Party Defendant:
Bo Wigley and Bo Wiggly
Counter Claimant:
Thomas Avalos, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Contract Dispute
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
