Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Rasheed v. Marchette et al
as 5:2023cv00129
Plaintiff:
Basil Abdul Rasheed
Defendant:
Jude Marchette, Mary Marchette and Jude Marchette, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
RASHEED v. DISALVO et al
as 2:2022cv01871
Plaintiff:
ABDUL RASHEED
Defendant:
LT. DISALVO, CAPTAIN NEWMAN, E. ARMEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Abdul Rasheed v. Saez, et al
as 22-3106
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ABDUL RASHEED
Defendant / Appellee:
LT. SAEZ, DOC/SCI-CAMP HILL, WARDEN CAMP HILL SCI, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER UNKNOWN, Unknown at this time and others
Defendant:
EMIG, Unknown at this time
Rasheed v. Sabadish
as 1:2022cv01657
Plaintiff:
Abdul Rasheed
Defendant:
Dale E. Sabadish
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RASHEED v. CAPOZZA et al
as 2:2021cv01513
Petitioner:
ABDUL RASHEED
Respondent:
WARDEN MARK CAPOZZA, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLANIA, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF FAYETTE COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Abdul Rasheed v. Daniel Mayer, et al
as 21-1030
Defendant / Appellee:
ORLANDO HARPER, Warden, SERGEANT RANDY JUSTICE, DETECTIVE DANIEL MAYER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ABDUL RASHEED
Defendant:
SGT. RANDY
RASHEED v. MEYERS et al
as 2:2020cv00232
Defendant:
SGT. RANDY, ORLANDO HARPER, DANIEL MEYERS and others
Plaintiff:
ABDUL RASHEED
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Rasheed v. Saez et al
as 3:2020cv00154
Defendant:
Laurel Harry, Lt. Saez and Correctional Officer Unknown
Plaintiff:
Abdul Rasheed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RASHEED v. MAYER et al
as 2:2019cv00834
Plaintiff:
ABDUL RASHEED
Defendant:
ORLANDO HARPER, DANIEL MAYER, SAM PASTER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Rasheed v. Texarkana, Arkansas, City of et al
as 4:2017cv04057
Plaintiff:
Basil Abdul Rasheed, Jr.
Defendant:
Texarkana, Arkansas, City of , Texarkana, Texas, City of , Susan O. Hickey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
