Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Banner Life Insurance Company v. Stone et al
as 9:2022cv80683
Plaintiff:
Banner Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Janet Stone and Gail Abelman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Antrell Brown v. MI, et al
as 22-1004
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTRELL VONICQUE BROWN, Islamic Ali
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF MICHIGAN, MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, UNKNOWN PART(Y)(IES) #1, named as Corizon Personnel and others
Brown #367927 v. Michigan, State of et al
as 1:2021cv00541
Plaintiff:
Antrell Vonicque Brown #367927 and Islamic Ali
Defendant:
Unknown Part(y)(ies) #3, Unknown Elbodi, Michigan, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. State of Michigan et al
as 9:2021cv00378
Plaintiff:
Antrel Vonique Brown, Islamic Ali and Antrell Vonicque Brown
Defendant:
Elbodi, Unit Chief Brett Coney, Danyelle Dobbins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jonathan Fix v. Union Bank et al
as 8:2020cv02197
Defendant:
Archer Capital Management Group, HDR Management, David Abelman and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Fix
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Rufus Spearman v. Mary Parson, et al
as 20-1913
Defendant / Appellee:
[UNKNOWN] HARRISON, CASE MANAGER KRETZ, PSYCHOLOGIST MITCHELL and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RUFUS SPEARMAN
Abelman v. Saul
as 4:2020cv00249
Plaintiff:
Sharon Abelman
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Abelman v. U.S. Bank National Association
as 8:2018cv04016
Defendant:
U.S. Bank National Association
Plaintiff:
Steven Abelman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Spearman v. Parson et al
as 2:2018cv10673
Plaintiff:
Rufus Spearman
Defendant:
Mary Parson, Rick Raymond, Hanna Saad and others
Spearman v. Michigan, State of et al
as 2:2017cv12805
Plaintiff:
Rufus L. Spearman
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Department of Mental Health, Michigan Department of Corrections and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
