Cases 1 - 10 of 13
(PS) Charles v. U.S. Office of Personnel Management et al
as 2:2023cv02200
Plaintiff:
Cassandra B. Charles
Defendant:
U.S. Office of Personnel Management, Pension Guranty Corporation, Accenture Federal Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
BRIDGES et al v. ACCENTURE FEDERAL SERVICES LLC et al
as 1:2023cv01568
Plaintiff:
DEMETRIA BRIDGES, GREG GREGORIAN, CYNTHIA JESSE and others
Defendant:
ACCENTURE FEDERAL SERVICES LLC, ALIGHT SOLUTIONS LLC, RAVINDRA DEO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
MINIERI v. ACCENTURE FEDERAL SERVICES et al
as 2:2022cv05963
Plaintiff:
JENNA MINIERI
Defendant:
ACCENTURE FEDERAL SERVICES, ABC CORPORATIONS 1-5 (fictitious names not known to Plaintiff at this time) and ABC CORPORATIONS 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
Bree Omene v. Accenture Federal Services
as 20-7031
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Bree Omene
Defendant / Appellee:
Accenture Federal Services
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00126
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Tait v. Accenture Federal Services LLC et al
as 1:2018cv10847
Defendant:
Accenture Federal Services LLC and Accenture plc
Plaintiff:
Matthew M. Tait and Matthew A. Tait
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 ij
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv02414
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2018cv01496
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00024
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-2561
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
