Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Enga v. Saul
as 0:2019cv01775
Plaintiff:
Marcus Enga
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Nancy Berryhill and Andrew Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Linda Faye Williams v. Nancy Berryhill
as 2:2019cv03777
Plaintiff:
Linda Faye Williams
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Nancy Berryhill and Nancy Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Crocket v. Saul
as 0:2019cv01020
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Nancy Berryhill and Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Loland Lamont Crocket
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Maria E. Valencia v. Nancy Berryhill
as 2:2019cv02586
Plaintiff:
Maria E Valencia
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Nancy Berryhill and Nancy Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
April C. Slocum v. Nancy A. Berryhill
as 2:2019cv00911
Plaintiff:
April C Slocum
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Nancy Berryhill and Nancy Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv03353
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Doucet v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2018cv09048
Plaintiff:
Doucet Jay and Jay Doucet
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Nancy Berryhill and Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Cyres v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2018cv01294
Plaintiff:
Evelyn Betty Cyres and Evelyn Cyres
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Nancy Berryhill and Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427
San Antonio v. Berryhill
as 1:2018cv11639
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Alan San Antonio, Jr.
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Nancy Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Revy v. Berryhill
as 1:2017cv01996
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Nancy Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Kristen A Revy
Interested Party:
Social Security Adminstration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
