Voting Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 62
Alabama State Conference of the NAACP et al v. Marshall et al
as 2:2024cv00420
Plaintiff: Alabama State Conference of the NAACP, League of Women Voters of Alabama, League of Women Voters of Alabama Education Fund and others
Defendant: Steve Marshall, William R Adair, T Kirke Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pennsylvania State Conference of NAACP Branches, et al v. Northampton County Board of Elections, et al
as 23-3166
Plaintiff / Appellee: PENNSYLVANIA STATE CONFERENCE OF NAACP BRANCHES, LEAGUE OF WOMAN VOTERS OF PENNSYLVANIA, PHILADELPHIANS ORGANIZED TO WITNESS EMPOWER AND REBUILD and others
Defendant / Appellee: NORTHAMPTON COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, SECRETARY COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, ADAMS COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS and others
Not Yet Classified: RICHARD MARINO, DEMOCRATIC SENATORIAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE, DEMOCRATIC CONGRESSIONAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE, NATIONAL REPUBLICAN CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEE and REPUBLICAN PARTY OF PENNSYLVANIA
Appellant: STATE OF ALABAMA, BRYAN CUTLER, KIM WARD and others
Amicus Curiae: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Appellee: THE PROTECT DEMOCRACY PROJECT and SENIORLAW CENTER
WILLIAMS et al v. HALL et al
as 1:2023cv01057
Plaintiff: SHAUNA WILLIAMS, FLOR HERRERA-PICASSO, MINERVA FREEMAN and others
Defendant: DESTIN HALL, WARREN DANIEL, RALPH E. HISE, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
In re: Georgia Senate Bill 202
as 23-13085
Plaintiff / Appellee: THE NEW GEORGIA PROJECT, BLACK VOTERS MATTER FUND, RISE, INC. and others
Intervenor: REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE, NATIONAL REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL COMMITTEE, NATIONAL REPUBLICAN CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEE and others
Defendant / Appellant: GEORGIA SECRETARY OF STATE, MATTHEW MASHBURN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR DOUGHERTY COUNTY and others
Not Classified By Court: SERVICE, JOHNNY VARNER, JACK NOA and others
Viera v. Hudman
as 23-40325
Plaintiff / Appellant: Patrice Viera, Kevin Henry and Brittany Darbonne
Defendant / Appellee: Joyce Hudman, Brazoria County Clerk, Matt Sebesta, Jr., Brazoria County Judge, Donald Payne, Brazoria County Commissioner Precinct 1 and others
Rochester, NY NAACP Branch #2172 et al v. Monroe County et al
as 6:2022cv06558
Plaintiff: Rochester, NY NAACP Branch #2172, Faith Leaders Roundtable, Robin Wilt and others
Defendant: Monroe County, Adam Bello, Steven Brew and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Goldstein et al v. Monroe County et al
as 6:2022cv06536
Plaintiff: Linda Garner Goldstein, Michael D. Ditullio, Craig R. Lending and others
Defendant: Monroe County, Adam Bello, Sabrina Lamar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
EAKIN et al v. ADAMS COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00340
Plaintiff: BETTY EAKIN, INES MASSELLA, FETTERMAN FOR PA and others
Defendant: ADAMS COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, ALLEGHENY COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, BEAVER COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS and others
Intervenor: DAVID BALL, JAMES D. BEE, DEBRA BIRO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
PENNSYLVANIA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP et al v. CHAPMAN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00339
Plaintiff: PENNSYLVANIA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP, LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF PENNSYLVANIA, PHILADELPHIANS ORGANIZED TO WITNESS and others
Defendant: LEIGH M. CHAPMAN, ADAMS COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, ALLEGHENY COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS and others
Intervenor: DAVID BALL, JAMES D. BEE, DEBRA BIRO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Viera et al v. Hudman et al
as 3:2022cv00386
Petitioner: Patrice Viera, Kevin Henry and Brittany Darbonne
Respondent: Joyce Hudman, Matt Sebesta, Jr., Dude Payne and others
Defendant: Stacy Adams and Donald Payne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973 Voting Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?