Cases 11 - 20 of 12,529
Rodney Hurdsman v. Rodney Wright, et al
as 24-1997
Plaintiff:
Rodney Adam Hurdsman
Defendant:
Viapath Technologies, Inc., formerly known as Globel Tel-Link, Rodney Wright, Sheriff, Saline County, Saline County, Arkansas and others
Anthony Hoover El v. Stephen Waddel
as 24-6226
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LEON HOOVER EL
Defendant:
STEPHEN WADDEL, Warden IV, JASON ADAMS, Gatekeeper, EDDIE M. BUFFALOE, JR., Magistrate and others
Wyner v. Dockery et al
as 4:2024cv04037
Plaintiff:
Phillip James Wyner
Defendant:
Sergeant Dockery, Sergeant Frazier, Lieutenant Guthrie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawkins v. Mawhorr et al
as 1:2024cv00188
Plaintiff:
Kameron Hawkins
Defendant:
Adams County Sheriff Dan Mawhorr, Conrad Dyer, Cody Givens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Teague (PS) v. Kurtenbach et al
as 1:2024cv00754
Plaintiff:
David Adam Teague
Defendant:
Angela Kurtenbach, Stephen Giles and Jeff Long
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv03110
Plaintiff:
Delon Scott
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Brittany Greene, Tara Goins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mainieri v. USA
as 4:2024cv00335
Petitioner:
Adam Joseph Mainieri
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
ADAMS v. MEEKS et al
as 2:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
TERRY T. ADAMS, JR.
Defendant:
JERRICHA MEEKS, STOOPY, DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez v. Chappell et al
as 3:2024cv02737
Plaintiff:
Eric L. Gonzalez
Defendant:
Kevin Chappell, Eleanore Adams, Brian Lutz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brandt v. Cimarron Correctional Facility and Staff, et al
as 24-6089
Plaintiff:
DONNA R. BRANDT
Defendant:
CIMARRON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY AND STAFF, TERRACE DICKERSON, Former Warden, FNU GRANTE, Assistance Warden and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
