Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Perez v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC et al
as 3:2023cv11343
Plaintiff:
Adan Perez, Jr.
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline LLC, GlaxoSmithKline Holdings (Americas) Inc., GlaxoSmithKline plc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lau et al v. ZTE Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv01855
Plaintiff:
Christopher J. Rosebrock, Christopher Jason Rozanski, David William Haalili Lau and others
Defendant:
ZTE Corporation, ZTE (USA) Inc., ZTE (TX) Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2021cv00644
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Salvador Perez Sixto v. Jeffrey Rosen
as 21-70059
Respondent:
JEFFREY A. ROSEN, Acting Attorney General
Petitioner:
SALVADOR ADAN PEREZ SIXTO
Adan Perez v. NetCredit Loan Services, LLC
as 5:2020cv02167
Defendant:
NetCredit Loan Services, LLC
Plaintiff:
Adan Perez
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Adan Perez-Zazueta v. William Barr
as 19-71255
Petitioner:
ADAN PEREZ-ZAZUETA
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Perez-Ramos v. USA - 2255
as 1:2016cv01923
Petitioner:
Adan Perez-Ramos
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Aguilar et al v. Harren & Partner Ship Management GmbH & Co KG
as 3:2015cv00298
Plaintiff:
Deiby Aguilar , Diego Alejandro , Daniel Dominguez Arevalo and others
Defendant:
Harren & Partner Ship Management GmbH & Co KG
Claimant:
Harren & Partner SUMO-Shipping GmbH & Co KG MS "PALMAROLA"
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Fifer et al v. Montenegro et al
as 1:2014cv00548
Plaintiff:
Brent Fifer and Cynthia Fifer
Defendant:
Apolinar Montenegro, Adan Perez, Arnulfo Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Perez v. Weslaco Independent School District et al
as 7:2011cv00119
Defendant:
Weslaco Independent School District and Richard Rivera
Plaintiff:
Adan Perez, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
