Cases 1 - 10 of 899
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00763
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Simpson v. Advanced Auto Parts, Inc.
as 2:2024cv10650
Plaintiff:
Douglas Simpson
Defendant:
Advanced Auto Parts, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Linden v. Advance Auto Parts, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
KAMA LINDEN
Defendant:
Advance Auto Parts, Inc., Carla J. Bailo, John F. Ferraro and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Gervat v. Bailo et al
as 5:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Hugues Gervat
Defendant:
Carla J. Bailo, John F. Ferraro, Joan M. Hilson and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Ivic v. Advance Stores Company, Incorporated et al
as 3:2024mc00008
Plaintiff:
Juraj Ivic
Defendant:
Advance Stores Company, Incorporated doing business as Advance Auto Parts, North Sunrise Corp., Lane-Valente Industries, Inc. and others
Holder et al v. Bailo
as 5:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
Braxton Holder and Edward L. Weaver
Defendant:
Carla J. Bailo, John F. Ferraro, Joan M. Hilson and others
UNITED STATES v. 0.1785 acres of land, more or less, situate in Chesapeake, Virginia et al
as 2:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
MSF Investors II, LLC, Arcadia Equity Associates, City Of Chesapeake and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Holland v. Advance Auto Parts et al
as 1:2023cv01726
Plaintiff:
Melony Holland
Defendant:
Advance Auto Parts and Pace Runners Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
