Cases 1 - 10 of 26
WOODS v. ALLEGIS GROUP INC et al
as 2:2022cv00389
Plaintiff:
JAMAURA WOODS
Defendant:
ALLEGIS GROUP INC, ALLEGIS GLOBAL SOLUTIONS INC, AEROTEK INC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Roundtree et al v. Aerotek, Inc.
as 1:2021cv05434
Plaintiff:
Onieko Dolphy and Leetisha Roundtree
Defendant:
Aerotek, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
TURNBULL et al v. BOWMAN CONSULTING GROUP, LTD., INC et al
as 0:2020cv60864
Plaintiff:
DAVID TURNBULL and NORMA DEAN-CLARKSON
Defendant:
BOWMAN CONSULTING GROUP, LTD., INC and AEROTEK, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Hall v. Aerotek, Inc.
as 1:2019cv01094
Plaintiff:
Leon Hall
Defendant:
Aerotek, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Walker v. Aerotek, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00178
Defendant:
Allegis Group, Inc. and Aerotek, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Rishan Walker
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Harris v. General Motors, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv10308
Defendant:
Aerotek, Inc., Darren Simpson, General Motors, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Harris
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
HEDGE v. TOYOTA MOTOR MANUFACTURING, INDIANA, INC. et al
as 3:2018cv00246
Plaintiff:
DENIA HEDGE, DUSTIN TURLEY and MELISSA MCCLARY
Defendant:
TOYOTA MOTOR MANUFACTURING, INDIANA, INC. and AEROTEK, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Abdul-Hasib v. Aerotek, Inc.
as 1:2017cv01502
Defendant:
Aerotek, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Lina Abdul-Hasib , Aliyah Smith and Beverly McGunigal
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Terri Hayford v. NationStar Mortgage, LLC, et al
as 17-15614
Plaintiff - Appellee:
TERRI HAYFORD, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellant:
NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC
Defendant:
AEROTEK, INC.
Hudson et al v. General Motors LLC et al
as 4:2016cv10326
Plaintiff:
Jovena Hudson and Jawanda Hill
Defendant:
General Motors LLC and Aerotek Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
