Cases 1 - 10 of 79
Garcia v. Cain et al
as 1:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Alberto Julio Garcia
Defendant:
Burl Cain and Marc McClure
Interested Party:
Charles Blanchard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00453
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
(HC) Cruz-Garcia v. Warden, F.C.I. Mendota
as 1:2024cv00076
Petitioner:
Jose Alberto Cruz-Garcia
Respondent:
Warden, F.C.I. Mendota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
GARCIA v. READING POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 5:2023cv04908
Plaintiff:
ALBERTO J. GARCIA, JR.
Defendant:
READING POLICE DEPARTMENT, RDG POLICE OFFICER CRISTIAN MOROR, RDG POLICE OFFICER MS. SUPER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00206
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Race Discrimination
Gonzalez-Garcia v. Garland
as 23-60403
Petitioner:
Carlos Alberto Gonzalez-Garcia
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Gonzalez-Garcia v. Garland
as 23-814
Petitioner:
CARLOS ALBERTO GONZALEZ-GARCIA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Garcia et al v. New Force Construction Corp. et al
as 1:2023cv02336
Plaintiff:
Alberto Orea Garcia, Galo Jhovany Munoz Nieto and Quintil Garcia Ramirez
Defendant:
New Force Construction Corp., Constructors Trades and Skills Corp. and Norbert Wlodkowski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Ojeda Garcia v. Garland
as 22-1714
Petitioner:
JOSE ALBERTO OJEDA GARCIA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Hernandez Velasquez, et al. v. Garland
as 22-1254
Petitioner:
LESBIA NOEMI HERNANDEZ VELASQUEZ, ALBERTO ONELIO GARCIA-HERNANDEZ and EDDY DANIEL GARCIA-HERNANDEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
