Cases 61 - 70 of 304
United States of America v. Alcoa Inc et al
as 3:2013cv01126
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Alcoa Inc, City of East St. Louis, Illinois and Alton & Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
Berenyi Inc v. Fluor Enterprises Inc et al
as 2:2013cv01836
Plaintiff:
Berenyi Inc
Defendant:
Fluor Enterprises Inc and Alcoa Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00036
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilites Act
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. ALCOA, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv01405
Plaintiff:
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
ALCOA, Inc. and Sapa Extrusions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
United States of America et al v. Alcoa Inc. et al
as 7:2013cv00337
Plaintiff:
United States of America , State of New York and St. Regis Mohawk Tribe
Defendant:
Alcoa Inc. and Reynolds Metals Co.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
Smith et al v. Norcold, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv10841
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Smith and Cheryl Smith
Defendant:
Norcold, Inc., Alcoa, Inc., Alcoa Energy Services, Inc. and others
Clear With Computers LLC v. Alcoa Inc
as 6:2013cv00170
Plaintiff:
Clear With Computers LLC
Defendant:
Alcoa Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
ESPOSITO v. ALCOA INC.
as 2:2013cv00859
Plaintiff:
DENNIS J. ESPOSITO
Defendant:
ALCOA INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
COULTER v. ALCOA, INC.
as 2:2013cv00191
Plaintiff:
LISA A. COULTER
Defendant:
ALCOA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Walsen v. Alcoa Inc.
as 1:2013cv00243
Plaintiff:
Thomas J Walsen
Defendant:
Alcoa Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
