Cases 21 - 30 of 828
MAZON: A Jewish Response to Hunger et al v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 1:2021cv00475
Defendant:
Secretary of Veterans Affairs, currently Robert Wilkie, Secretary of Homeland Security, currently identified as Peter T. Gaynor in an acting capacity, Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, currently Dr. Ben Carson and others
Plaintiff:
Ark of Freedom Alliance, American Atheists, Hindu American Foundation and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
NATIONAL CONSUMER VOICE FOR QUALITY LONG-TERM CARE et al v. AZAR et al
as 1:2021cv00162
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ALEX M. AZAR, II, SECRETARY, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, CENTERS FOR MEDICARE AND MEDICAID SERVICES and others
Plaintiff:
CALIFORNIA ADVOCATES FOR NURSING HOME REFORM and NATIONAL CONSUMER VOICE FOR QUALITY LONG-TERM CARE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Oakwood Ventures, LLC v. Cochran
as 4:2021cv03011
Plaintiff:
Oakwood Ventures, LLC and Oakwood Ventures, LLC doing business as Belle Terrace
Defendant:
Secretary Alex M Azar, II and Norris Cochran
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
NATIONAL COMMUNITY PHARMACISTS ASSOCIATION v. BECERRA
as 1:2021cv00131
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II, NORRIS COCHRAN and XAVIER BECERRA
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL COMMUNITY PHARMACISTS ASSOCIATION, AMERICAN PHARMACISTS ASSOCIATION, TYSON DRUGS, INC. doing business as TYSON DRUG CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
State of California, et al v. Alex Azar, II, et al
as 21-15091
Intervenor Plaintiff:
SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION LOCAL 503, CAMILLE CHRISTIAN, VIRGINIA GRANT and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, STATE OF CONNECTICUT, STATE OF ILLINOIS and others
Defendant / Appellant:
ALEX M. AZAR II and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
NOVO NORDISK INC. et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 3:2021cv00806
Defendant:
ROBERT P. CHARROW, THOMAS J. ENGELS, ALEX M. AZAR, II and others
Plaintiff:
NOVO NORDISK PHARMA, INC. and NOVO NORDISK INC.
Intervenor:
ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN MEDICAL COLLEGES, 340B HEALTH, AMERICAN SOCIETY OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACISTS and others
Interested Party:
ACTING U.S. AG JEFFREY A. ROSEN and U.S. ATTORNEY OFFICE FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2005
PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTHEAST, INC et al v. AZAR et al
as 1:2021cv00117
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, SEEMA VERMA and others
Plaintiff:
PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTHEAST, INC and FEMINIST WOMEN'S HEALTH CENTER
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S., LLC v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 3:2021cv00634
Defendant:
ROBERT P. CHARROW, THOMAS J. ENGELS, ALEX M. AZAR II and others
Plaintiff:
SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S., LLC
Amicus Curiae:
ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN MEDICAL COLLEGES, NOVO NORDISK INC., AMERICAN SOCIETY OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACISTS and others
Intervenor:
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CHILDREN'S HOSPITALS d/b/a CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY et al v. HEALTH RESOURCES AND SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, et al
as 1:2021cv00081
Defendant:
ROBERT P. CHARROW, THOMAS J. ENGELS, ALEX M. AZAR, II and others
Plaintiff:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY and LILLY USA, LLC
Intervenor:
The Children's Hospital Association, 340B HEALTH, THEAMERICIAN HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION and others
Amicus Curiae:
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS, LITTLE RIVERS HEALTH CARE INC, RYAN WHITE CLINICS FOR 340B ACCESS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
PHARMACEUTICAL CARE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 1:2021cv00095
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II, JEFFREY A. ROSEN, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Plaintiff:
PHARMACEUTICAL CARE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
