Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Clark v. Hotard
as 26-30431
Plaintiff:
Alexander Clark
Defendant:
Jean Hotard, Calvin Taylor Bowden and Jason Ard
Cartagena Chacon v. Lenexa, Kansas, City of et al
as 2:2026cv02365
Plaintiff:
Dora A. Cartagena Chacon
Defendant:
Lenexa, Kansas, City of, Nicholas Gaul and Alexander Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McKesson Corporation et al v. Home Care Rx, Inc. et al
as 8:2026cv00777
Plaintiff:
McKesson Corporation, McKesson Plasma and Biologics LLC and McKesson Medical-Surgical Minnesota Supply Inc.
Defendant:
Home Care Rx, Inc., Nest Rx, LLC, Jason T. Tran and others
Cross-Complainant:
Douglas L. Bischoff, Alexander Clark and Nest Rx, LLC
Cross-Defendant:
Jason Tran, CARERX, LLC, Roes and others
Counter-Claimant:
Nest Rx, LLC
Counter-Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, McKesson Medical-Surgical Minnesota Supply Inc. and McKesson Plasma and Biologics LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
USA v. Hantson Clark
as 25-11925
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
HANTSON ALEXANDER CLARK, a.k.a. Hank
Thurston v. Henrico Doctors Hospital Parham et al
as 3:2024cv00521
Defendant:
Henrico Doctors Hospital Parham, Dr William McKenna and Justice Alexander Clark
Plaintiff:
Michael Thurston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joseph Clarke v. Kimberly Esmond Adams, et al
as 22-14330
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH ALEXANDER CLARKE
Defendant / Appellee:
KIMBERLY M. ESMOND ADAMS, FANI T. WILLIS, CATHELENE TINA ROBINSON and others
Clarke v. Adams et al
as 1:2022cv04408
Plaintiff:
Joseph Alexander Clarke
Defendant:
Kimberly M. Esmond Adams, Fani T. Willis, Cathelene Tina Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Hotard et al
as 3:2022cv00326
Plaintiff:
Alexander Clark
Defendant:
Jean Hotard, Calvin Taylor Bowden, Jason Ard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
