Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Joseph Pitts v. Nolan Espinda, et al
as 22-16599
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH PITTS
Defendant / Appellee:
NOLAN ESPINDA, FRANCIS SEQUIERA, CAESAR ALTERIS, AKA Caesar Altaris and others
Norton v. Rodrigues
as 21-1866
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TYLER RAYMOND NORTON
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL L. RODRIGUES, SBCC Deputy Superintendent
Defendant:
OSVALDO VIDAL, SBCC Superintendent, BRIAN MCDONALD, SBCC Director of Security, STEVEN SILVA, SBCC Director of Operations and others
Remauro et al v. de Blasio
as 1:2021cv04553
Plaintiff:
Leticia Remauro, Jane Frangos, William Pepitone and others
Defendant:
Bill de Blasio and New York City
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv10501
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00059
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Norton v. Rodrigues et al
as 1:2015cv13216
Plaintiff:
Tyler Raymond Norton
Defendant:
Michael Rodrigues, Osvaldo Videl, Brian McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rivers v. Alteri et al
as 2:2014cv01267
Plaintiff:
Rufus Rivers
Defendant:
G Alteri, Bobby Shuler, Berkeley County Public Defender Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Edward Day, Jr. v. Jeannette Baseball Association, et al
as 13-4684
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD E. DAY, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
JEANNETTE BASEBALL ASSOCIATION, JIM POMPEI, President and LOUIS ALTERI, Chairman
Argo Group US Inc et al v. Professional Governmental Underwriters Inc et al
as 8:2013cv01787
Plaintiff:
Alteris Insurance Services Inc, Argo Group International Holdings Ltd, Argo Group US Inc and others
Defendant:
Professional Governmental Underwriters Inc and Ronald W Seymour
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
