Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Burns v. Newell et al
as 4:2023cv00073
Plaintiff:
Amanda Burns
Defendant:
Justin Newell and Grenada County, Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00150
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
BURNS v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC. et al
as 3:2021cv06381
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC.
Plaintiff:
AMANDA BURNS
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Burns v. Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd. et al
as 1:2020cv20806
Defendant:
Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd., Loud And Clear, Inc., On The Blue, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Amanda Burns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Burns v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2019cv01611
Defendant:
Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Healthcare LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Amanda Burns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BOBO et al v. BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
as 2:2017cv03968
Plaintiff:
MADLYNE BOBO , EMA HERNANDEZ , RONALD HUGHES and others
Defendant:
BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Randall Burns, et al v. Tracy Carlson, et al
as 13-3782
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Randall E. Burns, The Estate of Nicole Burns, deceased, will proceed under Missouri Rule 52.13(a)(1), under substitution of Plaintiff Randall E. Burns, Father and Amanda Burns
Defendant - Appellee:
Tracy Carlson, Prosecuting Attorney, Linn County, Missouri, County of Linn, Missouri and City of Brookfield, Missouri, Others Unknown to the Plaintiffs at this time
Burns, et al v. Carlson, et al.
as 2:2013cv00088
Plaintiff:
Randall E. Burns and Amanda Burns
Defendant:
Tracy Carlson, County of Linn, Missouri and City of Brookfield, Missouri
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
